Give every claim
its proper weight.

A litigation workspace that turns case files into source-linked intelligence, considered drafts and accountable next steps.

A claim is not a finding.

In this fictional example, a notice was dispatched. That alone does not establish that it was received.

Make the record readable. Then make it useful.

Document processing and OCR bring scanned material into the case workflow. NyayaDesk connects extracted information to allegations, events and source pages—so the next step starts with context.

Illustrative scanner and monitor displaying document recognition and extracted fields.
Illustrative technology scene, not an application screenshot.

Turn case files into a chronology you can inspect.

See which document supports each event—and which part of the story is still missing. Select an event to inspect its source.

Trace the sequence.

Illustrative matter
Dispatch register · p. 2
“Entry 14 · Notice dispatched · 8 February.”

This establishes dispatch, not receipt.

Illustrative source excerpt
Select an event to inspect its source. All records are fictional.

Follow the claim.
Find the missing proof.

The product’s difference is not simply generating an answer. It is keeping the answer open to inspection.

NyayaDesk / Evidence reviewFact confirmation needed
PetitionParagraph 4
The allegation

“No notice
was received.”

The fictional applicant disputes receipt. The response must distinguish what is asserted from what the record establishes.

Source excerptIllustrative matter
The question

What can we actually establish?

Start with the allegation. Then inspect the dispatch entry and the independent check.

Source-linked reasoningAI review is not legal approval.

Illustrative product interaction · independently fictional content, not a live matter.

The whole matter.
Not another silo.

From case understanding to execution, one record carries the context forward.

Understand the case before you draft.

Bring petitions and annexures into one matter. Extract allegations, reconstruct chronology and trace each finding to its source.

Explore case intelligence

Connect the record.

Matter workspace
Petition.pdf AllegationsCorrespondence.pdf ChronologyDispatch register.pdf Evidence
Connected finding

The petition disputes receipt. The register establishes dispatch. The missing acknowledgement becomes an evidence request—not an invented fact.

Inspect case intelligence
Fictional example · curated product view

Draft a response the record supports.

Develop the legal position, prepare a source-linked draft and inspect the checker’s findings before human approval.

Explore drafting & strategy

Inspect the revision.

Draft verification
Version 2 · proposed wording

“The notice was received on 8 February.

Source attached

Dispatch register · p. 2 records dispatch. Does the proposed sentence go further than the evidence?

Fictional example · curated product view

Research the law. Reuse relevant work.

Read the authority behind a proposition and find related work in your organisation’s authorised matters.

Explore research & knowledge

Bring prior work into view.

Related matters

What supports our position on receipt?

Current matter

Dispatch and receipt are separate facts.

The source records sending. Acknowledgement evidence is still missing.

Inspect an authorised prior position
Earlier supplier dispute · fictional

The earlier response asserted dispatch only. No claim of receipt was made without supporting evidence.

Prior response · paragraph 6

Private matter knowledge remains separate from public legal authorities.

Fictional example · curated product view

Know what is due, who owns it and why.

Connect hearings, court directions and evidence requests to a responsible person, a date basis and the record of completion.

Explore hearings & compliance

From direction to action.

Orders & compliance
Example order · paragraph 3

“Provide the requested correspondence within the directed period.”

Receipt date
Awaiting confirmation
Responsible person
Assigned record owner
Due-date basis
Receipt + configured rule
Status
Not yet activated
What happens next?

A person confirms the direction and receipt. The obligation can then activate with a recorded due-date basis. Completion requires evidence and review.

Fictional example · curated product view

Inspect the revision.

Draft verification
Version 2 · proposed wording

“The notice was received on 8 February.

Source attached

Dispatch register · p. 2 records dispatch. Does the proposed sentence go further than the evidence?

Fictional example · curated product view

One model prepares.
Another challenges.
People decide.

Independent model families check the work. Unresolved facts stay visible. A clean AI check never becomes a person’s legal approval.

Three fictional professionals review work together in a calm, petrol-toned workspace.

Shared knowledge.
Defined boundaries.

Coordinate an organisation’s litigation without making every matter visible to everyone.

Explore organisational workspaces
People
Role- and matter-scoped access
Knowledge
Retrieval within authorised records
Responsibility
Named owners and recorded decisions

Bring the whole matter into view.

Explore NyayaDesk for your organisation’s records, people and review process.

Talk to us

What is NyayaDesk?

NyayaDesk is a litigation workspace that connects case files, source-linked analysis, legal research, strategy, drafting, independent AI review, hearings and compliance. People retain responsibility for facts, approvals and legal acts.

Explore the complete product