For legal teams coordinating across departments, offices and external counsel. Share the right context while keeping access and responsibility explicit.
Give each person the context they need, while keeping access, factual confirmation and legal approval distinct.
Your organisationPolicies · roles · authorised workspaces
Legal teamStrategy, review and legal approval
Record ownersEvidence and factual confirmation
CoordinatorsTasks, dates and operational oversight
Illustrative responsibility map. Actual roles and access follow your organisation’s configuration.
For counsel.
Open a matter with the chronology, evidence, legal issues and proposed response already connected. Inspect the source and checker findings before making the legal decision.
Matter brief and hearing preparation
Versioned strategy and draft review
Research and prior-position context
For the people who hold the record.
Receive a clear factual question, the document it relates to and a due date. Confirm, correct or explain what is unknown without being asked to make a legal judgment.
Assigned evidence requests
Plain-language fact confirmation
Linked records and reminder history
For those responsible for the whole.
See workload, overdue obligations and readiness within your authorised scope. Administrators manage roles, units, templates and policies; platform operations do not imply access to legal records.
Scoped dashboards and analytics
Organisation hierarchy and matter grants
Audited administrative changes
Fit the deployment to the organisation.
The architecture supports shared-database isolation, dedicated databases and dedicated stacks. Hosting and AI processing are separate questions; confirm both during onboarding.
It supports organisation hierarchies, role- and matter-scoped access, owned tasks, shared authorised knowledge and recorded decisions across teams. Single sign-on and deployment follow the organisation’s configuration.