Research the law.
Remember your own record.

A legal authority and an earlier organisational position answer different questions. NyayaDesk helps you find both, without confusing public law with private matter knowledge.

Discuss your workspace

A law library.
Within reach.

The subjects a litigation team returns to. These headings introduce the subjects, not a claim of source coverage.

Constitution

Rights, powers and public institutions. Start with the available source text and verify the provision in context.

Civil Procedure

Find the procedural source behind the next step. Check the applicable text before relying on a proposition.

Evidence

Separate what the record proves from what still needs support. Return to the underlying passage.

Administrative Law

Explore questions of authority, process and public decision-making through available legal sources.

Writ Jurisdiction

Frame the research question, examine relevant authorities and retain their verification status.

Service Law

Keep the legal proposition distinct from the employment record. Review both before drafting.

Land & Revenue

Locate relevant provisions and inspect the matter record separately. Coverage depends on enabled sources.

Legal Research

Search the available corpus, inspect passages and save authorities to a matter for human review.

Drafting

Bring checked research into the response. Keep citations and unsupported propositions visible to the reviewer.

Court Practice

Use source-linked research alongside your matter workflow. Always check current court requirements independently.

Research you can
follow back.

A question, a passage, a checked proposition. The research workflow, step by step.

Ask a precise question

Begin with the proposition you need to test, not the answer you hope to find.

Define the boundary

Keep public legal authorities separate from private organisational records. Access to one does not grant access to the other.

Search available sources

Text and semantic retrieval help locate relevant material in the enabled corpus.

Know the coverage

Available sources vary by workspace. A missing result is not proof that no authority exists.

Read the passage

Open the underlying source. Read the words around the cited passage before relying on a proposition.

Keep the locator

A citation should lead the reviewer back to the relevant passage, not just the document title.

Check the authority

Inspect the verification state. An authority that cannot be verified must remain visibly unverified.

Review independently

Check relevance, currency and applicability yourself. A generated answer does not replace professional judgment.

Remember prior work

Search authorised litigation records for related matters and earlier organisational positions.

Respect access

Private matter knowledge is permission-filtered. It remains distinct from the public research layer.

Save to the matter

Retain useful authorities with the matter so the team can return to the source during review.

Preserve the context

Keep the question, proposition and supporting passage together when developing the response.

Ask in context

Legal AI and Ask this case use the available context to help answer a matter-specific question.

Watch the status

Streaming answers are labelled while checking is underway. Citations and retained versions support review.

Keep people in control

A proposed task, reminder or evidence request waits for explicit human confirmation.

Decide deliberately

Review the source, verify the proposition and confirm the next action. The person remains responsible for the decision.

Find prior work you can actually use.

Inspect an earlier position inside authorised matter knowledge, then return to the source. Public authorities remain a separate research layer.

Bring prior work into view.

Related matters

What supports our position on receipt?

Current matter

Dispatch and receipt are separate facts.

The source records sending. Acknowledgement evidence is still missing.

Inspect an authorised prior position
Earlier supplier dispute · fictional

The earlier response asserted dispatch only. No claim of receipt was made without supporting evidence.

Prior response · paragraph 6

Private matter knowledge remains separate from public legal authorities.

Fictional example · curated product view

Dispatch and acknowledgement

Dispatch and receipt are separate facts.

Supplier correspondence chronology

Notice, response and correspondence remain source-linked.

Unanswered evidence request

Receipt evidence is still missing.

Fictional examples, not live matter records.

Read the source behind the proposition.

Research combines text and semantic retrieval over the available corpus. Results carry passages, locators and verification states, so an unverifiable authority is never dressed up as verified.

  • Save authorities to a matter
  • Inspect the underlying passage
  • Verification status stays visible

A library, in the workflow.

The Law Library brings legislation and the available judgment collection into a dedicated reader. Search, categories and reading controls help you move from discovery to the text itself.

  • Legislation and case-law shelves
  • Search and reader themes
  • Coverage depends on enabled, available sources

Find the matters that matter.

Related matters show why a record is relevant. Search your organisation’s authorised litigation history and examine prior positions before developing a new response.

  • Permission-filtered retrieval
  • Related-matter explanations
  • Source-linked position consistency findings

Ask, then act deliberately.

Legal AI and Ask this case answer in context. After independent checking, proposed tasks, reminders and evidence requests become available for a person to confirm.

  • Streaming answers labelled while being checked
  • Source citations and retained answer versions
  • Explicit confirmation before a proposed action runs

Continue exploring

Hearings & compliance

Bring the whole matter into view.

Explore NyayaDesk for your organisation’s records, people and review process.

Talk to us

Can NyayaDesk search an organisation’s prior matters?

Yes. It retrieves relevant material within the user’s authorised litigation records. Public legal authorities and private matter knowledge remain distinct, with source passages and verification states available for review.

Read the access boundaries